Databases selected:  ABI/INFORM Research, Hoover's Company Records

Document View

« Back to My Research                
Print  |  Email  |  Copy link  |  Cite this  | 
 
Other available formats:
Taxation as agricultural property denied for property supporting greenhouses
M H Stiegler. The Appraisal Journal. Chicago: Jul 2003. Vol. 71, Iss. 3; pg. 198

Abstract (Summary)

In Welby Gardens Co. v. County, The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that property supporting greenhouses, where products are grown in fully enclosed, environmentally controlled buildings, is not a "farm" property for purposes of ad valorem taxation.

Full Text

 
(320  words)
Copyright Appraisal Institute Jul 2003

The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that property supporting greenhouses, where products are grown in fully enclosed, environmentally controlled buildings, is not a "farm" property for purposes of ad valorem taxation.

The property at issue consisted of two parcels of land that were used primarily for greenhouses and greenhouse support buildings. The taxpayer, Welby Gardens Company, produced vegetables, flowers, and fruiting plant starts. Most of the products were grown in containers in the greenhouses; however, Welby also had a test field of about three acres in which plants were grown in the ground. The environment of the greenhouses was regulated using water systems, humidity pads, fans, and heaters. In the tax year 1999, the county assessor classified and valued the property as commercial land and improvements. Welby appealed to the Board of Assessment Appeals, which classified the property as agricultural. The county appealed.

The appellate court said that agricultural land in Colorado receives favorable ad valorem tax treatment calculated on the basis of the earning or productive capacity of the land. The court pointed out that for agricultural purposes, a "farm" is land that is used to produce agricultural products that originate from the land's productivity. The court said that there must be some relationship between the agricultural products and the productive capacity of the parcel of land for it to qualify as agricultural land. Here, the court said, the land served only to provide a site for a greenhouse operation; the products involved do not originate from the productivity of the land on which the greenhouses are located. Thus, the court found that the land was not a farm and could not be classified and valued as agricultural for property tax purposes. The order of the Board of Assessment Appeals was reversed.

Welby Gardens Co. v. County

Colorado Court of Appeals

January 3, 2002

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing

May 23, 2002

Certiorari Granted

October 28, 2002

(AJ/10/A.-$10)

Indexing (document details)

Subjects:State court decisions,  Greenhouses,  Ad valorem taxes,  Property taxes
Classification Codes9190 United States,  4210 Institutional taxation,  4330 Litigation,  8400 Agriculture industry
Locations:United States,  US,  Colorado
Companies:Welby Gardens Co (NAICS: 111421 )
Author(s):M H Stiegler
Document types:News
Section:Cases in brief
Publication title:The Appraisal Journal. Chicago: Jul 2003. Vol. 71, Iss. 3;  pg. 198
Source type:Periodical
ISSN:00037087
ProQuest document ID:383847621
Text Word Count320
Document URL:

Print  |  Email  |  Copy link  |  Cite this  |  Publisher Information
^ Back to Top « Back to My Research                
Copyright © 2009 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions
Text-only interface