Content area
Abstract
This dissertation explores whether or not a person's genuine moral duties can conflict with another's. I argue that such conflicts are possible in non-consequentialist moral theories. First, I argue that moral duties may conflict without signaling an inconsistency in the theory that engenders them. I argue that conflicts of duties will nevertheless be rare. Second, I give an account of the types of moral duties that people have that are capable of conflicting. I argue that the types of duties that are prone to conflict will be generated by social institutions. I argue that the moral principle of fairness can explain why we have the institutionally-generated duties that are prone to conflicting.