Content area

Abstract

Spaced practice generally leads to better long-term recall than massed practice. The present study examined the conditions under which college students choose to mass or space practice when given the choice. Students studied word pairs of varying difficulty and decided whether they wanted to study each pair again, and, if so, whether to study it immediately (massed practice) or later (spaced practice). The likelihood of choosing spaced practice did not vary with a priori item difficulty but was higher when pairs were presented for 5 secs rather than 1 sec. The former result is most consistent with the Discrepancy Reduction model, as interpreted by Benjamin and Bird (2006), whereas the latter result is more consistent with the Region of Proximal Learning model (Metcalfe & Kornell, 2005). In the discussion, we consider how these findings, and findings from previous work (i.e., Son, 2004), might be reconciled within a single explanatory framework.

Details

Title
How do subjects use judgments of item difficulty to guide study strategies in selection of spaced or massed practice? A comparison of theories
Author
Cohen, Michael S.
Year
2007
Publisher
ProQuest Dissertations Publishing
ISBN
978-0-549-07600-1
Source type
Dissertation or Thesis
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
304806954
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.