Databases selected:  ABI/INFORM Research, Hoover's Company Records

Document View

               
Print  |  Email  |  Copy link  |  Cite this  | 
 
Other available formats:
Partnering for global growth
Steven E Glover. Association Management. Washington: Oct 2001. Vol. 53, Iss. 10; pg. 66, 8 pgs

Abstract (Summary)

In the association world, globalization usually entails partnering in some shape or form with counterpart organizations in other countries. Based on the many costs and challenges of going global, few associations choose to go it alone. Developing the right partnering arrangement for your circumstances and objectives is the most critical component to the success of your international operations. Of course, a partnership arrangement that seems right during the planning stages might wind up problematic during the implementation. Required is flexibility - an understanding that revisions will be needed as situations change and as you learn lessons from various partnering efforts. That is normal. But to get started with the highest degree of confidence possible in your initial partnership arrangement - and the strongest likelihood that this arrangement will be effective - you must put significant time and effort into research and planning. Guidelines are presented.

Full Text

 
(4766  words)
Copyright American Society of Association Executives Oct 2001

[Headnote]
A strong business partnership pumps up an association's ability to spread its services, products, and programs abroad.


IT'S A BEAUTIFUL SUMMER AFTERNOON. As YOU ENJOY A COOKOUT IN THE BACKYARD WITH your family, you watch your children playing and think about how much the world will change in their lifetime. You realize how small the world seems today compared to when you were a kid. During just the past 10 years, you observed nationally focused organizations evolve into global entities. But those transformations didn't happen automatically; they resulted from careful planning and effective partnering.

In the association world, globalization usually entails partnering in some shape or form with counterpart organizations in other countries. Based on the many costs and challenges of going global, few associations choose to go it alone. Developing the right partnering arrangement for your circumstances and objectives is the most critical component to the success of your international operations.

Of course, a partnership arrangement that seems right during the planning stages might wind up problematic during the implementation. Required is flexibility-an understanding that revisions will be needed as situations change and as you learn lessons from various partnering efforts. That's normal. But to get started with the highest degree of confidence possible in your initial partnership arrangement-and the strongest likelihood that this arrangement will be effective-- you must put significant time and effort into research and planning.

The results of your research are the raw ingredients of your business plan. You need to study thoroughly what countries possess good market potential, what organizations might make good partners, what it would cost to establish operations and conduct business in each potential country, and what implementation strategies to consider. Collecting and analyzing this information will lead you to a wise choice from the wide array of partnership arrangements.

Business planning

considerations

Determine what you want to accomplish. Are you looking only to gain international members or to also sell them products and services? Will you be seeking partners in countries where the de facto language is English or in countries with diverse languages? What other considerations relate to your objectives?

Based on your present U.S. operations, determine what activities and resources would be required to accomplish your international objectives. What activities could be performed by existing staff? Would any activities require outside assistance from a local partner? Would another type of partnership arrangement work?

Now determine which partnering model best satisfies your needs. Ensure that whatever model you select reflects the results of your research, is marketable to prospective partners, can be implemented within your budgetary constraints, and supports your association's mission. This final consideration will be the most important in gaining the support of your domestic member base and of your board.

International business

partnership models

There is no one international business partnership model that works best for every association. To decide which model is likely to best serve your needs, it's important to understand what each one entails.

Equity-based model. An equity-based operation involves either an association's purchase of another organization or a merger of the two. This type of model might be employed by an association attempting to grow significantly and avoid potential competition in the international marketplace. Examples of objectives that an association might achieve through this type of business model are adding members, diversifying training programs, and gaining ownership of a certification program.

Given the financial nature of the nonprofit world, an equity-based arrangement is rare: Few associations have the desire or resources to take this approach. Additionally, depending on the country involved, such an approach could be perceived by the local members as another example of "Yankee imperialism." However, the advantages gained from consolidating operations are that the association has direct managerial oversight, and one organizational brand is established, avoiding the potential of conflicting identities.

Local partner. A local partner arrangement can take many forms, including a relationship with an independent distributor, a franchise agreement, or a chapter relationship. All involve an existing or newly created organization residing within another country and helping to develop an association on a local level. This is generally the most popular approach to globalization because it provides for a local presence in the country (or region) without the staffing and management requirements associated with an equity-based approach. Additionally, the related expenses are much lower and the liability is more limited. Associations that take this approach can promote their international nature, yet still feel local to their members-the best of both worlds.

As ideal a model as this may seem, there are several caveats. Because an association does not have direct managerial oversight over the local operations, accountability standards must be established as a part of the contract. Then there must be someone to oversee the work of the local partner to ensure that contractual terms are being met.

The selection of a local partner can be costly and time consuming, but once the partnership is established, it should involve only limited costs. Due diligence must be performed to ensure that prospective partners have a good local reputation, are appropriately capitalized, and have a mission reasonably congruent with the mission of the association. Local partners need a clear understanding of the association and what their role will be. If the association is one of several organizations with ties to a particular local partner, there must be clarity about how the association is to be represented by the partner.

Strategic alliance. Strategic alliances, more limited in scope and substance than local partner arrangements, involve shared responsibility for the development and execution of a particular program, service, or product line. These alliances capitalize on the individual strengths of each participating organization, benefiting from bringing together strengths in such areas as operational management, market positioning, and brand recognition. Expenses are usually shared.

Strategic alliances limit a participating organization's liability to the scope of the project involved and provide reduced-cost opportunities and expertise. Moreover, each participating organization retains its own identity. However, because brand identity is shared with the allied organization, an association's program, service, or product is subject to any changes in how the allied organization is perceived by its customers or members. Still, strategic alliances are probably the best model to consider for an association seeking limited development.

Internet-based model. Many associations are now taking advantage of the Internet for membership registration and maintenance, conference registration, and a multitude of other business applications. Using the Internet can be a costeffective means of globalizing an association; this approach is ideal for small associations with limited resources.

As many solutions as the Internet provides, it creates new challenges. Despite its ease of access, for example, the Internet requires promotion to drive people to a Web site. Once they get there, some of the questions will be: Are they familiar with the language used on the site? Will dues and other fees be charged in local currency or U.S. dollars? Will there be alternatives to credit card payment (in many parts of the world, people prefer to pay by cash or check)? Are there mirror sites in various geographical locations to account for slower modem speeds?

Member relations is the lifeblood of an association. It's difficult to think of a profession or industry with which the related association could build and maintain a member base without some personal contact to reinforce the prospect's decision to join and the member's decision to renew. Therefore, the Internet, placed into context, would be best suited to complement and reinforce another international business strategy.

Hybrid. By combining elements from the models above, a hybrid can be formed that fits an association's particular needs. This could mean that membership registration is centralized through the association's Web site, while a local partner or strategic alliance translates and distributes the publications and educational programs.

Choosing a model. It cannot be emphasized enough that there is no one correct global partnering model. The right model for your association is the one chosen through careful business planning that takes all factors into consideration and permits some flexibility for changing conditions.

Once you select a model, it's time to define how it will work. You'll need to map out workflow processes and delineate responsibilities for all parties involved. Expect to do this several times, each time creating different scenarios based on different financial and marketing models.

Financial model

Create a financial model based on your objectives. Are you seeking to develop operations that will ultimately result in a contribution to surplus or merely function as a breakeven operation? What costs will be associated with your global partnership arrangement? Costs include everything from estimated developmental costs, to day-to-day operational costs, to legal expenses. Remember, it's better to overestimate costs from the start than to be in a position of having to return to your board later for an additional capital contribution. Doing the latter will give skeptics on your board an opportunity to question the validity of having international operations.

It is crucial to know how well capitalized your prospective partner is and to determine what the partner's costs will be. For example, if the partner will incur high start-up costs for such things as staffing, legal, translation, and printing functions, there may be a limitation on the amount of resources that can be allocated to marketing your program. With fewer resources devoted to marketing, it may be difficult to achieve the initial projections used in establishing your model.

Other things to consider include local pricing schedules, market volatility, and currency fluctuations. Although your member dues and other fees may be priced at what would be considered fair market value for the United States, the same may not be true for other countries. If you can obtain the data, find out what the average per capita income is for your domestic members, then divide your annual dues by that figure to determine the percentage of annual income your dues represent. Now, for each market in which you intend to have operations, do the same, but convert the local currency income to the U.S. dollar equivalent and use your domestic dues amount to perform the same calculation. Although not intended as a scientific means of determining pricing, you will quickly see that the pricing schedules used in the United States may be totally unsuitable for another market. You will need to determine who will establish pricing and how much latitude will be granted for adjustment. Keep in mind that if prices are established in local currency, as they usually are, the revenue you receive from any local partnership operation will be affected by market volatility and its impact on international currency exchange rates.

Marketing model

Next, develop a marketing model that answers the questions of which markets to enter, in what order, and in what time frame. Outline who will do what, with whom, and how.

In most cases you will be limited to contractual control of a local partner's marketing activity, so be clear on expectations and include in your contract some language pertaining to marketing obligations. However, don't get too specific. Cultural constraints and variations in business practices do exist and must be considered. Focus on achieving objectives and revenue targets, not on the means by which they are achieved. Of course, if your association plans to directly allocate resources and engage in marketing activities in other countries, you need to be assured of your local partners' cooperation and compliance. Unless you have an equity-based operation, your primary (and perhaps only) means of establishing accountability and compliance will stem from the terms of your contract.

For maximum efficiency, determine what marketing systems are universally applicable. Although there needs to be room for flexibility, standardize as much as you can to facilitate the management of multiple country operations. Doing so will allow you to streamline operations, saving you time and money. It will also establish consistency and advance the development of an international network, even in the absence of an equity-based partnership.

Measuring performance

With any global partnering arrangement, accountability standards need to be established at the start of the relationship and clearly articulated to all parties. A local partner might firmly believe it can realize rapid growth of a program, only to realize a year or two later that there was more to getting the program up and running and establishing an identity. It's important for a local partner to understand what is expected and what the ramifications will be if expectations are not met.

Based on your financial and marketing objectives, determine and formalize in your contract minimum activity standards. Whether or not you choose to hold your local partners to these standards is a decision to be made on an individual basis, but be careful not to set a precedent that could allow other local partners to accuse you of inequitable treatment. Extenuating circumstances may occur, however, where making exceptions or compromises would be in the best long-term interests of all involved.

Domestic staffing

considerations

Now that you have formed the basis of your international business strategy, consider its impact on staff. Although most of the operational activities are likely to be conducted by any local partners in your globalization plan, your staff will need to address issues related to managing the partnership and overseeing the work.

Generally, plan to have at least one staff person serve as the principal contact for your local partners, manage the relationships, and ensure that your association is fulfilling its obligations to partners. You may need someone who has international management and marketing experience, has foreign language skills, and is sensitive to cultural differences. You may also need to retrain your existing staff on new accountabilities related to international operations-international invoicing, mailing and shipping procedures, cultural sensitivity, and so on.

Legal issues

Many legal issues must be addressed when creating global partnerships. We all know how expensive legal fees are, but they are much less costly when put in the context of potential lost revenue from stolen intellectual property or, even worse, a lawsuit. To minimize legal expenses, before you call your attorney, have a clear understanding of what you want to do and how you want to structure your global partnering arrangement. If you are experienced in writing contracts, you may want to create a rough draft.

While you want to be sure that your property is protected and your liability is minimized, you still need an arrangement that you can sell to prospective partners. Weigh the advice and suggestions you receive against your business objectives. When in doubt, rely on your attorney's advice.

Exit strategies

All global partnering arrangements require exit strategies. These serve as your contingency plans if something goes wrong or if there is a change in the direction of your association or your partner Is organization. Creating exit strategies can be rather difficult, as they're based on many factors: organizational issues, international relations, sociopolitical climates, economic conditions, and more.

In your partner contract there needs to be a section defining the provisions of when and how you could terminate the relationship and any associated costs in doing so. Generally speaking, you would only terminate a relationship if it was not fruitful, or a provision of your contract was violated by your local partner, or your local partner was damaging the reputation of your association. However, legislative changes or political upheavals could nullify an otherwise successful relationship and result in its termination. Although rare, it is a possibility that needs to be accounted for.

Keep in mind that contracts do not address what strategies to employ to compensate for the loss of revenue from a partner. That is something that needs to be a part of your overall international business plan.

Selling your plan and

achieving consensus

Most likely if you are considering a global partnering arrangement, you will be working with a committee of board members to conduct the initial research and formulation of recommendations to present to the entire board or the executive committee. How you present your business case will go a long way toward achieving consensus. Form a compelling, well-written proposal. Include information on market potential, prospective partners, financial projections, and any other relevant data and analysis that will reinforce your proposal. Supportive member-opinion survey results can also be excellent selling tools.

Your board will most likely prefer to have multiple options to choose from, including the anticipated outcomes of each scenario and a recommended option. Include at least three options in your proposal, beginning with the lukewarm option, followed by the least favorable option, and ending with the most favorable one, plus your recommendation. Although not foolproof, by placing the worst and best options next to each other, you will probably invoke the persuasive principle of contrast. Since option two will almost certainly be objectionable to all, the relative merit of option three will be apparent and the likelihood of getting consensus on your recommendation will increase.

Be prepared to receive objections. just remember that you have had months to review data and become intimately familiar with the proposal; your board might not have had the same opportunity. Seek first to educare, then clarify the true objections when voiced, and reference your business case and supporting documentation to overcome objections. With only four true objections to overcome-no money, no need, no time, and no trust-you can do it.

The global partnering approach is not without challenges. While extensive research and planning will greatly improve your chances for success, things that you did not consider at first will become clearer as you become more experienced. Changing market conditions may cause you to rethink your strategy. Just remain flexible and take heed of the global partnering lessons learned by other associations.

[Sidebar]
Partnership Snapshot:
American Society for Quality

[Sidebar]
The American Society for Quality, Milwaukee, is an organization of more than 120,000 quality professionals worldwide. ASQ is implementing a WorldPartner Program. To qualify for participation, potential partner societies create a profile of their organization using four criteria: leadership, organization and activities, membership, and results. The profile provides

[Sidebar]
ASQ with a better understanding of the potential partner organization's mission, programs, and capabilities. The profile also provides a basis for self-assessment and improvement management. ASO has completed its own profile and provides this example along with criteria guidelines. The society's international cooperation committee then reviews the profiles submitted and provides a recommendation to the board of directors for approval of new WorldPartners.
One of the key components of the WorldPartner Program is identification of the needs of the specific market. For example, ASO delivers training programs with its WorldPartner to multinational corporation customers. The counterpart provides the venue and the expertise needed for promotion and marketing. ASO delivers the body of knowledge, trainers, and materials. The two organizations split profits and losses 50-50.
Michael O'Donoghue, ASQ's global markets development manager, emphasizes the need to "take special care in the description of your joint venture" when talking with prospective partners. "Words like affiliate and franchise should not be used if you wish to express a true partnership of equals. The associated rights and responsibilities of both parties can be influenced by this terminology. Hire legal counsel to provide details of the various forms of partnerships-preferably counsel from the country of your potential partner."

[Sidebar]
Partnership Snapshot: Automotive
Maintenance and Repair Association

[Sidebar]
Four years ago, the Automotive Maintenance and Repair Association, Washington, D.C., an organization of 200 corporate companies, established the Motorist Assurance Program (MAP), accrediting automotive maintenance and repair facilities. Two years ago, at the request of the Automotive Industries Association of Canada, AMRA licensed a separate,

[Sidebar]
wholly owned subsidiary of AIA to establish and operate the Motorist Assurance Program of Canada. MAPC is a franchise of AMRA/MAP U.S.
In the agreement, AMRA owns exclusive rights to the MAP name and logo, the standards of service for automotive repair, all printed materials, the methods and procedures for administering MAP, and the right to all revisions to the program. Other characteristics of the agreement:
* AMRA owns the copyright to these materials even though MAPC translates the marketing materials and accreditation program into French. AMRA also pays the expense for reviewing the translation for technical accuracy if desired.
* The license is exclusive within Canada. However, AMRA may establish and operate a MAP outside of Canada.
* Designees from AMRA and MAPC sit on each other's board.
Larry Hecker, CAE, president of AMRA, offers this advice to other organizations considering franchise agreements: "Make sure both parties have an understanding of the obligations and the responsibilities of the agreement, especially when key players change. It's vital to have both sides working off the same set of expectations."

[Sidebar]
Partnership Snapshot: BICSI: A
Telecommunications Association

[Sidebar]
BICSI: A Telecommunications Association, Tampa, represents nearly 20,000 individuals from more than 85 countries. Members are responsible for the design and distribution of telecommunications wiring in bUildings. BICSI administers more than 300 trainin(i COUrses a year, mostly ir the United States, in which members enroll to prepare for the Registered Communica

[Sidebar]
tion Distribution Designer designation. In the past few years, to support the significant growth of international members who are also seeking the RCDD, BICSI started establishing licensing agreements with technical training companies overseas. To date, licensing agreements have been established in the United Kingdom, Brazil, and Australia.
Each licensee receives a two-year license with annual paymetns of U.S.$10,000 BICSI provides the course material, retaining the copyright. The association sets up local steering committees to review the course material for technical accuracy, correct translation of material (where appropriate), and ensure inclusion of issues specific to the country or industry practice. The licensee is responsible for finding instructors and a facility and for marketing the course.
According to Joe Jones, BICSI's education development manager, drafting licensing agreements can be costly anf time consuming. BICSI paid legal counsel several thousand dollars to adapt its U.S. license for other countries.
"Make sure you thoroughly research and choose your partners carefully," urges Jones. He reports that BICSI lost out on half of a two-year licensing fee "because one of the licensed vendors did not have the marketing expertise or the insructors, and the company dissolved.

[Sidebar]
Partnership Snapshot:
The American College

[Sidebar]
The American College (formerly LUTC, Life Underwriter Training Council), Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, provides sales training for the life insurance and financial services industry. The organization does not have members per se; its primary source of revenue is from training programs offered throughout the United States and 15 other countries.

[Sidebar]
In the early 1990s, LUTC provided intercompany classes that could only be offered through a local life underwriter association. The organization limited its efforts to identifying potential international sponsors (life underwriting associations and training institutes) in a specific country. Any customization or translation of the course material was the responsibility of the sponsors.
In 1992, LUTC hired its first full-time staff person to develop overseas markets and hired an outside marketing firm. The firm and LUTC developed a partnership in which each party contributed proportionate capital early on.
Because LUTC was reluctant to invest in course translation and adaptation, the most promising countries seemed to be where English was spoken or where it was the predominant business language. Still, LUTC staff and the marketing partner were able to develop sponsorship agreements in eight non-English-speaking countries.
Rather than pursue emerging markets, in 1998, because of a projected loss and financial crisis, LUTC downsized its staff and incorporated the international operations into the marketing department. The organization refocused its efforts on serving its existing sponsor relationships and postponed initiatives to add sponsors.
LUTC's relationship with its international sponsors evolved from a franchise to more of a distributorship or sublicense arrangement. The American College does not provide the course materials packaged and ready to go, nor does it require an up-front franchise fee along with a percentage of sales. The production of the materials and all costs of the training are the responsibility of the sponsoring organization, and the international sponsor pays a royalty to The American College based on the course tuition charged to participants. However, The American College has an established minimum production requirement, in terms of annual revenue generation.

[Sidebar]
Partnership Snapshot: The American
Society for Testing and Materials

[Sidebar]
The American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, represents approximately 32,000 professionals in more than 100 countries who develop consensus standards for materials, products, systems, and services. One of ASTM's activities is offering training Courses. To meet the demand by members outside the United States, the society

[Sidebar]
has started partnering with universities and companies overseas.
For example, ASTM has a business partnership with the University of Queensland in Australia. ASTM provides the curriculum and the instructors. The university provides the venue, marketing, and administrative support. A member of the university faculty, who is also on the ASTM Technical Committee, knows the market and promotes the courses to a targeted audience. The university receives 15 percent of the gross profit along with a reimbursement of expenses, and the balance of revenue goes to the society. ASTM's director of education services, Scott Murphy, says, "We tried in the past to market our courses without on-site help, but those efforts were met with limited success."
A second ASTM partnership is with a company in South Korea that employs ASTM members. This company had been sending employees to the United States for training, and the travel and time out of the office were becoming cost-prohibitive. This company also recognized the growing market in South Korea for the training.
ASTM sent a trainer to South Korea to conduct a train-the-trainer session at the company. The society then licensed this company to offer the ASTM courses in South Korea in exchange for a per-student royalty. The company provides the venue, pays translation expenses, and markets the course.

[Sidebar]
Partnership Snapshot:
WorldatWork

[Sidebar]
WorldatWork (formerly the American Compensation Association), Scottsdale, Arizona, is an organization of 26,000 compensation, benefit, and reward professionals. In 1995 ACA established a separate entity, the Global Remuner

[Sidebar]
ation Organization, to franchise training programs outside North America. GRO's goals were to become an extension of ACA outside the United States and to develop new profit centers, building ACAs presence worldwide and building brand recognition of ACAs training programs.
Before being used within a country, GRO would de-Americanize the training courses and groom local faculty to provide country-specific examples. Franchisees had to accept the training material as is, market the courses, and provide the facility.
Since early 1999, to make the franchise agreements more financially viable, GRO dissolved and went back under ACA. Among the lessons learned by the association from this partnership experience are these, from Jamie McClellan, the former administrator for GRO: "We should have spent more time researching the financial stability of our partners and articulating each other's expectations. More details regarding possible changes in fees should have been spelled out in the agreement. Once GRO negotiated fees for a training

[Sidebar]
course, it was very difficult to revise the fee for a different course." In addition, the association put too much faith in the franchisees' ability to market the training courses effectively. Some courses did not draw the expected participation, and GRO ended up losing money.
Since mid-2000, WorldatWork has developed new models for distributing training courses. "We no longer have a one-dimensional delivery system," reports Anne Ruddy, CEO. "In Australia, for example, we work through a business school; in the Middle East, a consulting practice; and in South Africa, with an association counterpart. In addition, we work through our members based in the United States that have subsidiaries overseas.
"In the past, we didn't have any criteria for choosing partners," Ruddy adds. "Now, we look for financial strength, longterm planning capacity, and marketing expertise."
Based on this new model, WorldatWork licenses courses for a price, less a percentage, and then is paid a royalty per participant, In some cases, the partner will do their own marketing, and in other cases, WorldatWork will assist in providing names and developing marketing material. With these new partners, for each of the training courses, WorldatWork now provides the core training through its own faculty, and the partner arranges for country-specific training.
WorldatWork is committed to a new strategy: "becoming glocal-developing global services that meet needs at the local level," Ruddy says. She is confident that this new approach to global business partnerships will be much more effective than in the past.

[Author Affiliation]
CASE STUDIES BY CAROLYN A. LUGBILL, CAE

[Author Affiliation]
Steven E. Glover is an international strategy consultant based in Ellicott City, Maryland. Previously he was director of international marketing with Life Underwriter Training Council, Bethesda, Maryland. E-mail: seglove@aol.com. Carolyn A. Lugbill, CAE, is president of Going Global Matters, Fairfax, Virginia. E-mail: clugbill@erols.com.

Indexing (document details)

Subjects:Associations,  Globalization,  Partnering,  Models,  Strategic planning
Classification Codes9540 Non-profit institutions,  1300 International trade & foreign investment,  9190 United States,  2310 Planning
Locations:United States,  US
Author(s):Steven E Glover
Author Affiliation:CASE STUDIES BY CAROLYN A. LUGBILL, CAE

Steven E. Glover is an international strategy consultant based in Ellicott City, Maryland. Previously he was director of international marketing with Life Underwriter Training Council, Bethesda, Maryland. E-mail: seglove@aol.com. Carolyn A. Lugbill, CAE, is president of Going Global Matters, Fairfax, Virginia. E-mail: clugbill@erols.com.
Document types:Feature
Publication title:Association Management. Washington: Oct 2001. Vol. 53, Iss. 10;  pg. 66, 8 pgs
Source type:Periodical
ISSN:00045578
ProQuest document ID:84658937
Text Word Count4766
Document URL:

Print  |  Email  |  Copy link  |  Cite this  |  Publisher Information
^ Back to Top                
Copyright © 2010 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions
Text-only interface