Help   About ProQuest | 

Dissertations & Theses
The world's most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses.Learn More...

Citation/Abstract

Print  |  Email  |  Order a Copy  
Building robustness to disturbance: Governance in southern African peace parks
by Schoon, Michael L., Ph.D., Indiana University, 2008, 245 pages; AAT 3344618

Abstract (Summary)

Transboundary conservation has gained currency over the past decade as an effective means for achieving a wide array of goals ranging from improved biodiversity conservation to regional economic development to the promotion of peace between countries. Studies to analyze these competing claims oscillate between views of transboundary protected areas (TPBAs) as panaceas that can solve wide-ranging societal challenges in any type of setting to studies that view them as idiosyncratic entities with no generalizable traits, and few studies assess institutional arrangements for governance. This study, by contrast, uses 150 key informant interviews within two TBPAs in southern Africa - the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park in Botswana and South Africa and the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe - to address analytically how different governance structures of transboundary protected areas maintain robustness in response to various types of disturbance.

The insights arise from the fundamentally different institutional development paths of the two cases. This study argues that that the bottom-up institutional development and the slow, unforced evolution of governance in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park have allowed governing bodies to learn how to adapt and respond to transformations in the social-ecological system from an operational level. By contrast, institutional development in the Great Limpopo has struggled operationally due to the top-down imposition of the park on local-level communities and officials and the short time horizons permitted for goal attainment. However, top-down park formation has resulted in other accomplishments, primarily in bridging international boundaries. The central premise is that the national-level commitment to the Great Limpopo results in greater degrees of cooperation at a policy level than in a park that develops from the bottom-up. Such high levels of policy cooperation without parallel gains in operational cooperation have led to unexpected challenges in the Great Limpopo.

Indexing (document details)

Advisor:Ostrom, Elinor
Committee members:Janssen, Marco A.,  Meretsky, Vicky J.,  O'Meara, Patrick O.,  Parks, Roger B.
School:Indiana University
Department:Public Policy
School Location:United States -- Indiana
Keyword(s):Governance, Institutions, Peace parks, Resilience, Robustness, Transboundary conservation, Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park, South Africa, Botswana, Mozambique, Zimbabwe
Source:DAI-A 70/02, Aug 2009
Source type:Dissertation
Subjects:Political science, Environmental science
Publication Number: AAT 3344618
ISBN:9781109027624
Document URL:http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=1679683011&sid=26&Fmt=2& clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD
ProQuest document ID:1679683011


 

 » Purchase the full text

Dissertations and theses can be purchased in a variety of formats which may include: PDF for web download, softcover, hardcover, or microform. Click the "Order a Copy" button to see the formats available for this item.

Available without purchase:

Preview  Preview

Full Text - PDF Full Text - PDF

This graduate work has been published as open access. About
Print  |  Email  |  Order a Copy  
^Back to Top
Copyright © 2009 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions