Help   About ProQuest | 

Dissertations & Theses
The world's most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses.Learn More...

Citation/Abstract

Print  |  Email  |  Order a Copy  
Science in politics: Eugenics, sterilization, and genetic screening
by Telling, Douglas Cushman, Ph.D., University of Massachusetts Amherst, 1988, 274 pages; AAT 8906337

Abstract (Summary)

This work examined applications of genetic knowledge for political purposes. A debate exists over whether technology operates according to deterministic imperatives or is subject to human control. The central concern of this work, therefore, was the capability of the political system to ensure that technological applications served ends consonant with the democratic and moral values of the American political system.

The first topic examined was the eugenic legacy. Beginning in the first third of this century as a nativistic enterprise, it was transformed after the 1930's into the application of genetic knowledge for the purposes of breeding a genetically perfected race. A review of contemporary sterilization practices followed. Despite the appearances of revived eugenics, the lure of the technical fix proved to be a better explanation for most sterilization uses studied. The final case study examined carrier, prenatal, and neonatal screening. Particular attention was paid to the legal status of the techniques, the politics of their establishment and accessibility, and their potential future applications. All of the techniques examined extended society's ability to address the issues motivating their introduction, but they also created new opportunities which extended their influence into new areas, challenging existing values (e.g., reproduction, marriage, individual autonomy, sanctity of life). The final discussion examined the political institutions' response to these techniques and their extended influence. Generally, the political system responded by addressing the techniques narrowly, paying minimal attention to the social values affected by the cumulative impact of the techniques. The courts reduced the techniques to individual rights and the legislatures narrowly defined the issues as technical or responded to interest group pressures. The result was technological incrementalism. For the political system to control democratically the ends to which technologies are applied, the legislative branches will have to act more systematically and substantively. Politics as usual--both institutionally and morally--is incapable of addressing the extended responsibility required by technological politics.

Indexing (document details)

Advisor:Gordon, Glen
School:University of Massachusetts Amherst
School Location:United States -- Massachusetts
Source:DAI-A 49/12, p. 3860, Jun 1989
Source type:Dissertation
Subjects:Political science
Publication Number: AAT 8906337
Document URL:http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=745563891&Fmt=7&clientId =79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD
ProQuest document ID:745563891


 

 » Purchase the full text

Dissertations and theses can be purchased in a variety of formats which may include: PDF for web download, softcover, hardcover, or microform. Click the "Order a Copy" button to see the formats available for this item.

Available without purchase:

Preview  Preview

Print  |  Email  |  Order a Copy  
^Back to Top
Copyright © 2009 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions